David — I just wanted to note that while I disagree with much of your post, most of those disagreements stem from the fact that I am an agnostic — as you note, it makes little sense for a non-Christian to try to refute arguments that are based on the Bible, or for Christians to make arguments to non-Christians based on the Bible. (The debate then turns to whether the Bible is in fact the word of God, a matter better suited for a different venue.)

I do, however, strongly disagree that the relationship between hair whorls and homosexuality is “pseudoscience.” Research in fact demonstrates a relationship between counterclockwise hair whorls and homosexuality in men.

Obviously, one’s hair whorl doesn’t cause one’s sexuality. But that doesn’t make the correlation itself, and the obvious conclusion from it that biological factors play a role in homosexuality (what could cause the two to be correlated, if not a common underlying biological cause?), “pseudoscience.”