Saturday’s Wall Street Journal contained an editorial, Getting Into Harvard,
that repeats one of the most often heard of all educational statistics — that people who have college degrees earn significantly more than people who don’t. The statistic isn’t erroneous, but misleads people into thinking that there is some necessarily, cause-and-effect relationship between the length of one’s formal education and his earnings.
First, the data include those who earned their degrees years ago, prior to
the erosion of academic standards and the degradation of the curriculum
that has been accelerating over the last few decades. As the recent
National Assessment of Adult Literacy shows, the literacy of college
graduates has been declining. For example, today, only 31% of college
graduates reach the “proficient” level with regard to their comprehension of
prose, compared with 40% in 1992. Not coincidentally, there is evidence
that increasing percentages of people who obtain college degrees wind up
taking “high school jobs” anyway. For many marginal students who get their
college degrees today, there may be negligible benefit to their costly years
in college.
Second, the gap between the earnings of college graduates and non-graduates
is in part attributable to credential inflation rather than human capital
gains. Due to the large numbers of college graduates these days, many
employers have settled upon the BA as a screening device. With a huge pool
of grads searching for work, employers have concluded that they can filter
out people who ended their formal education with high school — people who
are presumably going to be more difficult to train — without losing many
good prospects. As more and more career ladders are foreclosed to those
without degrees, it’s inevitable that the earnings gap will widen. Such
credential inflation, however, is extremely costly — four or more years of
college merely to be certified as employable in simple, entry level jobs
that don’t call for any particular mental acuity.
The trouble with our efforts at making college almost universal is that we
encourage many young people to enroll who are not really interested in
academic pursuits. In order to keep such students in school, institutions
water down their standards and introduce courses that are more for
entertainment than education. As far as our “investment” in higher education
goes, it seems that we are past the point of diminishing returns.






Comments