So I’ve gotten a couple of challenges or whatever to list the ten books that have most influenced my life. That would require too much thought, including deep thought about the meaning of “influence.” Instead, I’m going to list — in no particular order — authors from whom I regularly and semi-unconsciously “sample.” Sample, we jazz musicians know, doesn’t mean plagiarize. When someone else writes something that’s obviously true or at least rhetorically powerful, and I repeat it, I’m paying homage to the truth about who we are. And I can’t help but think you — if you know what you’re talking about — will immediately pick up on whom and what I’m sampling. I could go and rant about why I hate footnotes and scholarly writing in general.
On the list: It’s all about prose. It’s not that I don’t read (or watch) and enjoy novels, plays, poetry, TV and movies, and so forth, but I don’t absorb their content in the same way. I’m skipping Shakespeare and the Bible, because everyone who thinks and writes in English obviously owes them a lot. And we Catholics know better than to obsess over what the Bible says without some help.
By listing authors and not books, I can spare myself the pain of trying to remember exact titles.
1. Alexis de Tocqueville
2. Pascal
3. Walker Percy
4. Richard Rorty
5. Nietzsche
6. Joseph Ratzinger
7. Aristotle
8. Alexandre Kojeve
9. Leo Strauss
10. George Grant
11. Carey McWilliams
12. John Locke
13. Edmund Burke
14. Solzhenitsyn
15. Havel
16. Hannah Arendt
17. Chantal Delsol
18. Tom Wolfe
19. Roger Scruton
20. Marilynne Robinson
21. Publius
22. John Courtney Murray
23. Orestes Brownson
24. Pierre Manent
25. Mary Nichols
26. James Ceaser
27. Harvey Mansfield
28. Allan Bloom
29. William Alexander Percy
30. Simone Weil
31. Leon Kass
32. Chesterton
33. Delba Winthrop
34. Plato — pretty selectively
35. Aristophanes
36. Tyler Cowen
37. Christopher Lasch
38. Flannery O’Connor
39. James Schall
40. St. Augustine — last but pretty much the opposite of least
Well, I’m going to stop. This list must be criticized for being very white and American and maybe for being insufficiently Founderist. I really do admire African-American writing and am pretty open to what’s true about Buddhism, not to mention American Evangelical Christianity. But I really and truly am trying to tell the truth about what I think I’ve absorbed as debts for telling the truth as I see it.
I don’t agree with either the deep or the ”normative” views of many or most of the above. I’m pretty repulsed by much of what Bloom, Kojeve, Cowen, and Rorty say, for examples. But I have debts nonetheless. To avoid any misunderstanding, let me just conclude by saying that I owe a lot to Strauss and Straussians, while disagreeing radically with what I take to be Strauss’s “bottom line” about who each of us is.
UPDATE: This has excited FACEBOOK and EMAIL chatter. Quickly: I don’t speak Heideggerian or Voegelinese. But I should have included Rousseau, as the brains, after all, behind Kojeve and Bloom, among others. And I believe I said once, and correctly, that Rousseau’s HISTORY is Pascal’s PSYCHOLOGY. 41. Rousseau.






Comments