So as David Freddoso noted in the Corner, a group of conservative bloggers have filed an FEC complaint against Hillary Clinton’s campaign, alleging donors who allegedly do not exist, or are ineligible to give, or are probably straw donors.

I asked Allison Hayward, former FEC staffer to Bradley Smith, assistant professor of law at George Mason University, and NRO contributor what she makes of the situation:

I haven’t looked at the reports myself, but I get the feeling I don’t need to! It is stunning that the Clinton’s would let this sort of rogue fundraiser activity persist. Do they not advise their bundlers of the laws? Do they not look at the incoming checks and follow up when red flags appear? Do they simply not care?
It is wrong to say this is the way bundling is done. It isn’t. Campaigns suffer tremendous internal distractions as well as loss of credibility when this stuff comes out. There are fundraising staff whose job should be to brief bundling fundraisers and keep them on the right side of things.
When you see this you wonder if there is a “nudge, nudge, wink, wink” policy there.
If they had as a policy the intent to obscure straw donors, they could. It would be criminal, but doable. Here, their reports are sufficient to track down the story. So I would suspect the problem with the campaign is nonfeasance, rather than an intentional effort to accept illegal contributions.

You know what was weird? Last night Obama and Edwards needed to really take the fight to Hillary, and yet neither one breathed a word of Norman Hsu or other fundraising scandals.