. . .3 days after Van der Sloot was caught on tape committing the two planned crimes, he boarded a flight from Aruba to Columbia and on to Peru. The Aruban Attorney General told me that the FBI was warned that van der Sloot was leaving the country but that the FBI did not move.

At no time after he left the country, per my sources, was Kelly told by the FBI that the FBI had “lost” van der Sloot. Instead, Kelly was – it apears – mislead by the FBI into thinking an arrest was imminent.

After the murder in Peru, the US Attorney in Alabama unsealed an Amended Criminal Complaint charging van der Sloot with extortion and wire fraud (per the original plan.) What is not known is what was Amended or when the original Criminal Complaint was filed (it was apparently under seal.) Both these pieces of information could be helpful in better understanding what happened.

What is still not fully explained – is why the FBI did not act. It appears the crime was “delivered” to them on May 10 and in the best possible manner: on tape.

More to come.