Wisconsin Supreme Court Ducks Trump Campaign Claims of Election Improprieties

The judges are stalling to run out the clock on claims that actually have merit — even if they wouldn’t change the election outcome.

Share this story

The election specialist Shannon Zastoupil and election official Tom DeFazio work in a ballot room after Election Day at the Kenosha Municipal Building in Kenosha, Wis., November 4, 2020.

Daniel Acker/Reuters

It is being widely reported that the Trump campaign lost its lawsuit in the Wisconsin supreme court on Thursday. That is not what happened. By a 4–3 vote, and to the consternation of the dissenting judges, the majority claimed in a curt opinion that it could not entertain the case at this point for two reasons, one of which seems weak, and the other, a dodge.

Moreover, there appears just on the face of the opinions to be significant force to the campaign’s claims of impropriety. To be clear, though, this is not a fraud case.

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement