From this morning:

GORTON: I want to read you the one paragraph, it was the subject of Bob
Kerrey’s question, and ask you whether or not it is accurate.
The staff report reads, The FBI’s inability or unwillingness to share
information reportedly frustrated White House national security officials.
According to the former national counterterrorism coordinator Richard
Clarke, the National Security Council never received anything in writing
from the FBI whatsoever.
Former Deputy National Security Adviser James Steinberg stated that the
only time that the FBI provided the National Security Council with relevant
information was during the millennium crisis. Clarke told us that Attorney
General Reno was notified that the National Security Council could not run
an effective counterterrorism program without access to FBI information.
Is that a correct characterization?
FREEH: I don’t think it is.
I can’t speak for the frustration of other people, but with respect to
sharing information, you know, I didn’t provide written memos to Sandy
Berger or the president or anybody else at the NSC, but as I said before,
the attorney general and I, every two weeks, almost like clockwork in the
last 14 or 15 months of our overlapping tenure, sat with Sandy Berger in his
office for at least an hour, perhaps two hours, and went over every single
piece of counterterrorism, counterintelligence case that we have.
By the way, Dick Clarke was never present at any of those meetings. Why
Sandy Berger didn’t want him there, I don’t know.
But we had detailed discussions of all those matters on a bi- weekly
basis. So the notion that we weren’t sharing information is, as far as I am
concerned, an incorrect characterization.