Law & the Courts

SCOTUS Declines to Hear Challenge to Public Funding of Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood activists protest outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., June 28, 2017. (Joshua Roberts/Reuters )

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to review lower-court rulings that prevented pro-life activists in two states from ending public funding for Planned Parenthood.

Conservative justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Samuel Alito voted in favor of taking up the challenge, but fellow conservatives John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh voted against, depriving their colleagues of the four votes required to review a case.

The cases in question pertain to whether a Medicaid recipient who relies on Planned Parenthood for health services has the right to challenge her state’s decision to defund the organization. To date, state courts in Kansas and Louisiana have found that states violate federal law by depriving Planned Parenthood affiliates of Medicaid funding solely because they provide abortions.

Thomas, in his dissent, argued that the court should have taken up the case but was prevented from doing so by the politically charged atmosphere surrounding abortion.

“What explains the court’s refusal to do its job here? I suspect it has something to do with the fact that some respondents in these cases are named ‘Planned Parenthood,’” Thomas wrote.

Kansas and Louisiana attempted to terminate Medicaid contracts with Planned Parenthood affiliates in 2014 after the publication of hidden-camera videos that showed Planned Parenthood officials discussing the sale of fetal tissue.

Thomas argued that, while the cases do tangentially relate to the question of abortion, at issue is the more basic question of an individual Medicaid recipient’s relationship to her state government.

“It is true that these particular cases arose after several States alleged that Planned Parenthood affiliates had, among other things, engaged in ‘the illegal sale of fetal organs’ and ‘fraudulent billing practices,’ and thus removed Planned Parenthood as a state Medicaid provider,” Thomas wrote. “But these cases are not about abortion rights. They are about private rights of action under the Medicaid Act. Resolving the question presented here would not even affect Planned Parenthood’s ability to challenge the States’ decisions.”

Most Popular


Nathan Phillips Lied. The Media Bought It.

If you’re in a public place and someone starts heckling you, are you entitled to heckle back? How about if someone does something much worse than heckling you in a public place? What if that person in fact takes a drum up to you and starts banging it in your face? Are you entitled to heckle back? How about ... Read More

The Covington Affair

‘A  fuller and more complicated picture emerged.” Just so.   For an overheated few minutes, the world (meaning the world of people engaged in producing and consuming nanosecond-by-nanosecond commentary on the Internet) was rapt with revulsion at the sight of a group of smirking high-school boys — ... Read More

Alert: NRPlus Call with Devin Nunes is Imminent

We are delighted that Republican congressman Devin Nunes is joining us this week for a call with our NRPlus members. It’s Wednesday at 11:45 a.m. If you are a member, you should have an invite in your inbox. If you are not, you can sign up here. I’ll be moderating and we’ll be taking your questions through ... Read More