Louis Farrakhan, Rosie O’Donnell, Tom Cruise, et al.

Plaintiffs

v.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene

Defendant

Civil Action

No. 21-0934-NY

AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURY, COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT, AND VIOLATIONS OF TRADEMARK

Statement of the Case

1. Since arriving on the political scene, Congresswoman Greene has made repeated and advantageous use of theories and language — in part and in specific — that were the sole creation and property of the Plaintiffs. She has taken without attribution and without compensation the life’s work of Plaintiffs as it pertains to their unique and highly personal way of interpreting current events and world-historical milestones. Further, in many instances, while Defendant did not explicitly mimic Plaintiffs’ copyright-protected intellectual property, she developed her positions on events utilizing the logic and processes developed over time by Plaintiffs. Therefore, we are requesting compensatory and punitive damages and an injunction against further theorizing by Defendant.

Plaintiffs

2. Plaintiff Louis Farrakhan is a renowned scholar, speaker, and conspiracy theorist, and has been a figure on the national scene since the 1980s. He is known for his uplifting “Black Power” orations as well as his complex and intertwining theories about how, exactly, the world is manipulated and controlled by Jews. In fact, Plaintiff can be said to be the “market leader” in this kind of conspiracy-mongering, having blazed several trails regarding the Jews–Media and Jews–Epidemiology “connections.” In addition to these specific areas of intellectual property, Plaintiff has also pioneered the “multitiered” approach to these kinds of theories, inventing the process of connecting ancient anti-Semitic hatreds with current political crises such as Black Lives Matter. De­fendant has repeatedly and without license or payment utilized these processes — most notably connecting California wild fires, the liberal welfare state, and the Jewish banking family Rothschild — and the result has been a theft of Plaintiff’s livelihood, brand positioning in the marketplace, core value-add, and unique trade identity. Defendant has en­croached on Plaintiff’s signature anti-Semitism and has subverted and stolen the “attention” and “attribution” that is justly and solely his.

3. Plaintiff Rosie O’Donnell is a well-known actress, talk-show host, and television personality who has been instrumental to the success of such television hits as The View and The Rosie O’Donnell Show. Further, she has painstakingly developed over the years a brand identity as a person who believes that the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon (hereinafter referred to as “9/11”) were an inside job, perpetrated by shadowy figures within the government. Defendant has endorsed her own version of this theory — without payment or license or attribution — by making identical claims using identical language (see Appendix) in reference to the 9/11 attacks on the Pentagon. Defendant has flagrantly and shamelessly stolen the intellectual property of Plaintiff. Further, in language and in style, Defendant has encroached on Plaintiff’s unique logic and thought processes. When Defendant claims that the Sandy Hook Massacre did not take place and that the adults involved were out-of-work Broad­way actors and the children were dolls, the clear echoes are to Plaintiff’s insistence that 9/11 did not happen because “fire cannot melt steel.”

4. Plaintiff Tom Cruise is an internationally famous actor and movie personality who has dazzled audiences with his dramatic roles in such films as Jerry Maguire as well as his blockbuster action adventure series Mission: Impossible. In addition to these accomplishments, he is a well-known proponent of the religion of Scientology, central tenets of which are that an intergalactic war was waged millions of years ago for control of the Earth and that the evildoers are currently incarcerated in ice volcanoes along the Arctic ridge. Central to this account is the existence of space-based laser-type weaponry of the type referenced by Defendant in her assertion that certain wildfires were caused by space-based laser-type weaponry (in Defendant’s case, owned and operated by Jews; see No. 2 above), which constitutes an infringement and theft of the intellectual property of Plaintiff No. 3’s specific and individual brand and trade dress and dilutes the presence in the marketplace of Plaintiff’s unique perspective on space-based warfare and weaponry. Further, by attributing these weapons to Jews, Defendant compounds the injury by denying the adherents of Scientology their right and proper claim to the religion that “owns” the war in space, both future and past.

Please turn to page three.